
Complications and Management of Penile Girth Enhancement with Acellular Dermal Matrix
Tingmin Xu MD; Guoxi Zhang Prof; Wenjun Bai Prof; Qing Li Prof; Anpu Yang PhD; Qiushi Lin PhD; Tao Xu Prof; Xiaowei Zhang Prof
FIRST PUBLISHED: October 24, 2019 – The Journal of Sexual Medicine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.010
Introduction
Penile size has been a source of anxiety for many men, even if its length and girth measurements fall into a normal range. These men may seek penile girth enhancement (PGE) surgery.
The use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in PGE surgery has become more frequent over the years. This study focused on common complications associated with this filler.
Materials and Methods
Clinical records were reviewed for 78 men who underwent PGE with ADM between June 2016 and January 2019. The men ranged in age from 21 to 66 years, with an average age of 31 years.
Surgery was described as follows:
All patients were placed in the supine position. Under local or spinal anesthesia, a circumferential subcoronal incision was used for penile degloving. The incision was deepened through the skin and Colles’ fascia, and down to Buck’s fascia, which was preserved. The shaft was then degloved down to the root of the penis. One or 2 layers of ADM (10 × 10 cm, J-1 ADM, Beijing J.Y. Life Tissue Engineering) were cut according to the penis size and several mesh-like incisions were made in the penile shaft to guarantee vessel regeneration. The modified ADM was then wrapped around the penile shaft from the coronal sulcus to the root. These grafts were then sutured to Buck’s fascia with 4-0 vicryl from the root to the coronal sulcus of the glans. A pressure bandage was then used to wrap the penis with moderate compression to avoid shifting of the grafts, hematoma, and/or edema of the penile shaft. Antibiotic prophylaxis was administered the night before surgery and continued for 1 week after surgery. Patients were instructed not to have sexual intercourse for 2 months after surgery.
Results
After a three-month follow-up period, the average penile circumference increased by 1.1 centimeters. About 72% of the patients experienced complications, and ADM removal was necessary in 7 patients (9%)
The following complications were reported:
| Type | # of patients affected | % of patients affected | Description |
| Erectile discomfort | 47 | 60.26% | “dragging sensation during erection” |
| Delayed healing | 12 | 15.38% | skin cracking and graft exposure |
| Unobvious effect | 10 | 12.82% | disappointment with thickness |
| Wound hematomas | 8 | 10.26% | oozing of blood and swelling of surrounding skin |
| Foreskin edema | 7 | 8.97% | swelling of distal end of foreskin |
| Skin necrosis | 3 | 3.85% | always on dorsal side above graft, skin turned dark red, then black and necrotic |
| Wound infection | 4 | 5.13% | often secondary to skin necrosis |
Erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease were not reported as complications in this group of patients
Most complications began within 10 days of surgery and resolved within 60 days.
Seventy patients (90%) said they would be unwilling to have the surgery again.
Discussion
Another filling material, hyaluronic acid, has been shown to be effective and safe. It is “an ideal filling material for soft-tissue augmentation” and has a low incidence of complications. However, surgeons working with hyaluronic acid should have “relatively advanced surgical skills.”
Conclusions
“In summary, this study showed that even with standardized surgical methods and rigorous postoperative care, ADM use in PGE results in a high complication rate and poor patient satisfaction. Thus, ADM is not an ideal or safe method for PGE.”

Sign up here to receive ISSM Updates and stay informed about sexual medicine, ISSM news, events, and more.